aeroplane
In Urgent Need of Advice
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2010
- Posts
- 1,842
- Reaction score
- 0
Instigating what, haha?
You said 'Im not saying Ringo's not great'
but then you go and say he's not great, but he's decent.
I also agreed that Ringo probably wouldn't crack my top 10, maybe you should read my posts?
Oh, and I think you're the one who's instigating
Could be wrong but I'd guess what Prime was more or less saying is that just because Ringo might be a "great" drummer, it doesn't mean that Prime has to "like" him as a performer one iota.
Maybe I'm wrong?
For me, it has always been difficult to evaluate how good individual musicians really are. At least technically or skills-wise.
My belief is that more often than not, an artist is seen as being only as "good" as the material they are playing. Point being, many people who evaluate someone's technical ability or musical chops seem to fall into the rut of basing their opinion of a guy on the genre/type of material that a band does.
For example, maybe Men At Work's drummer just might be the "best" drummer in the history of music, as a technical drummer, but how could someone ever find that out by listening to their albums?
Just rambling, maybe I have a point. Maybe I don't?