That Was Then, This Is Now

[runningshoes]

He got old. Some can pull it off, some can't. I do think he looks pretty good for his age compared to some of the others we've seen.

 

[ILoveJimmyPage]

Roger is 67? He looks like he's in his 50's! Incredible.

 

[Tray73]

He certainly looks good compared to any of The Stones

 

[runningshoes]

He certainly looks good compared to any of The Stones

Charlie doesn't look too bad for a 70 year-old. Kind of grandfatherly.

 

[ILoveJimmyPage]

Ronnie Wood is a little wrinkly, but he looks a lot better than Mick and CERTAINLY better than Keith, that's for sure.

 

[ANF]

I must be alone but I think David Gilmour looks amazing at his age. His eyes are as beautiful as ever and I think the balding/shaved head look actually works far better on him than the long hair.

 

[runningshoes]

Paul still looks great.

 

[Tray73]

So does Ringo, can't quite believe he's 71!

 

[Peter Norway]

I knew this thread looked familiar.

http://www.classicrockforums.com/forum/f4/rockers-aging-13462/

Funny, right on.

This thread shares a certain kinship with "the ugliest people in rock" thread, or whatever that was called. I don't know, I suppose it's harmless, but there's something unpalatable about it all.

 

[runningshoes]

We're expecting a rash of celebrity suicides as a direct result of this thread.

James Taylor