Tell us about your stereo!

Craig in Indy

Your cool Uncle
Joined
Oct 3, 2009
Posts
717
Reaction score
0
Location
Circle City
Anyone remember Sony's ill-fated Elcaset? It was a large-format analog tape cassette format that was said to provide the benefits of reel-to-reel (tape width and speed) and cassettes (a closed, contained shell to protect the tape), though its size was considerably larger than cassettes, and therefore of questionable portability.

Unfortunately for Sony, it came along right when all the major advancements were being made in compact cassette tape formulations, and in noise reduction technology by Dolby Labs and others, so the Elcaset's raison d'etre (reduced hiss, extended frequency response and greater dynamic range, all in a cassette-enclosed tape medium) was short-lived. I remember one reviewer at the time calling it the perfect solution to a non-existent problem.

No question, though - for gearheads it would have been pretty neat - imagine a piece of equipment that used big honkin' hi-tech cassettes. Wouldn't that have been a cool thing to have around? ;)
 

LG

Fade To Black
Joined
Apr 20, 2009
Posts
36,862
Reaction score
80
I don't remember that Craig, if you can find some pictures that would be great.:D
 

Craig in Indy

Your cool Uncle
Joined
Oct 3, 2009
Posts
717
Reaction score
0
Location
Circle City
I don't have any pics of any the tape decks themselves, but here's a shot of one of the cassettes, with a standard compact cassette in the foreground for scale:

Elcaset.jpg
 

LG

Fade To Black
Joined
Apr 20, 2009
Posts
36,862
Reaction score
80
You would have to buy a new player obviously...no wonder they didn't catch on.

If they came out before the smaller cassettes and offered similar quality to reel to reel I am positive they would have been popular.
 

Craig in Indy

Your cool Uncle
Joined
Oct 3, 2009
Posts
717
Reaction score
0
Location
Circle City
Oh, no question they required a different player. And not just because of the size of the cassette. Like most R-to-R machines, Sony's Elcaset machines had 3 heads, where most cassette decks of the time had only two (until Nakamichi ushered in the era of truly high-fidelity cassette decks). Plus the tape was wider, and ran at a higher speed. And like they did with the Betamax VCR decks, the tape was mechanically withdrawn from the cassette body and stabilized on capstains and rollers inside the guts of the deck, so as to reduce wow and flutter. That way the quality of the recording and playback process wasn't as the mercy of a potentially poorly made tape shell mechanism. That was an admirable effort, but I lost count of how many times I had a Betamax machine crap out on me with a tape inside of it, with no way to eject the cassette.
 

LG

Fade To Black
Joined
Apr 20, 2009
Posts
36,862
Reaction score
80
Yeah and to top it all off Sony being complete morons refused to just patent it collect royalties and allow others to use the Beta format...end result VHS slaughtered them on the consumer side of things.

If I did buy one of those decks I would have hung on to it for sure. I almost bought a Revox reel to reel deck on e-bay three years ago, I was in a collecting mood but that has passed now.
 

jackory

The NEW King of Pop
Joined
Nov 10, 2008
Posts
175
Reaction score
0
Location
Oklahoma
A 15 year old Technics receiver, 2 big ass Cerwin Vega speakers and a Sony CD player/burner. I rarely listen to that one, though. Usually just a hundred dollar Sony CD/Tuner/Audio In job with XM Radio plugged in and usually through a pair of Bose headphones. I've got just under 2,000 CDs and one day soon I'll need to rip them all to wav files. Not today, though.
 

LG

Fade To Black
Joined
Apr 20, 2009
Posts
36,862
Reaction score
80
That will be a Big job Jackory, I know which application I would be using for that task.:D
 

Find member

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
31,577
Posts
1,126,366
Members
6,630
Latest member
ggiant

Members online

No members online now.
Top