Who's Halftime show-wowOW!

Gearjammer

Devout Heathen
Joined
Aug 2, 2005
Posts
1,150
Reaction score
0
Location
Waterville, ME
They were allright. I guess I really don't like the halftime show format very much. It doesn't matter much what act they put out there, I really don't care for medleys that are usually put on.

The Who sounded ok, it was a little rough in spots, but the music defintiely misses the punch from Entwistle's bass.
 

flipflop

Prisoner of rock'n'roll
Joined
Jan 20, 2010
Posts
1,409
Reaction score
4
Location
Denmark
I've really enjoyed the halftime shows in recent years - only the best and brightest has got what it takes to pull it off.

Who's set was great but there was a terrible, terrible cut/delay/sync-problem over here courtesy of the broadcasting company... :banghead:
 

METALPRIEST

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2009
Posts
33,603
Reaction score
70
Location
U.S.A.
These guys are getting up there. I really enjoyed it....I mean it's THE WHO at the Superbowl! :heheh:

:oy:
 

Tiny Tim

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2010
Posts
402
Reaction score
2
Meh. I hate those medleys the half time acts always do. And they couldn't pick one little suprise? A few bars of Pictures of Lily maybe? I'm not a big fan of sports/rock and roll "synergy" anyway. I'd prefer a good drum and bugle corp at halftime.:heheh:
 

gregjohnson1229

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2009
Posts
756
Reaction score
12
The Who Superbowl Performance

I personally thought the performance was garbage. It was so bad. Daltrey was so off. He looked, moved, and sounded like a 64 year old. He even said himself he was dissapointed in his performance. Townshend was the only member that looked like he had a pulse. I saw the Who 4 years ago and they were much better. I was shocked how bad they were. This is what CBS gets for continually putting out safe superbowl half time performances.
 

Find member

Forum statistics

Threads
30,746
Posts
1,070,598
Members
6,378
Latest member
jik32
Top