AboutAGirl said:
I take it you don't like classical, post-rock, prog?
I'm not sure what post-rock is. Had the question not come from you though, I would have been tempted to answer Dr. Dre, Insane Clown Posse and Britney Spears.
As far as classical, yes, I do indeed like classical. I have perhaps fifteen classical albums dating back to my high school days. My favourite composer is Beethoven followed by Tchaikovsky but my favourite single symphony is Dvorak's New World Symphony.
I like some prog, but not others. Without quibbling too much about the definition of "prog", the bands I like include Pink Floyd, Moody Blues, the Nice, Jethro Tull, Emerson, Lake & Palmer, Roxy Music, King Crimson, Supertramp and the Cars. Some of the ones I despise are Yes, the Electric Light Orchestra and Lighthouse, and I can't say I'm particularly keen on early Genesis although I'm trying to keep an open mind there in deference to Salmacis' Band of the Month thread.
Can I give a reasonable dissertation as to why I like some of these bands and don't like some of the others? No. Any dissertation would ultimately come down to value laden statements such as "I think they rock!" versus "Their music annoys me somehow". Another compelling factor would be precisely the time of my life when I was first exposed to these bands. There was a period back in high school when I gleefully embraced any band that I thought was expanding the boundaries of rock music. At some point though in the early seventies my cup ran over and I became more selective. I just went with what grabbed me right off the bat.
So are there any glaring inconsistencies to my taste in music? I'm sure all kinds can be pointed out. But so what? Whoever said that one's taste in music has to be internally consistent? That whoever isn't living in the real world.
BTW, I rather liked that Odinist track, much better than what I heard from I Lay Dying. I'll have to listen to the other links as well.