Jimi Hendrix Experience (Official Thread)

Johnny-Too-Good

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2013
Posts
1,568
Reaction score
6
Location
UK
The new Hendrix movie has been well and truly trashed by 'Classic Rock'. Take a read -

15 reasons the Jimi Hendrix movie is a failure


04/10/2014 ~ by Ali Catterall


Jimi: All Is By My Side is confused and contrived. And it contains none of Hendrix's music.

As Charles Shaar Murray wrote in his collection of Hendrix essays, Crosstown Traffic, the 1960s “are on continuous rotation – but the tape deteriorates each time”. So it is with the new Hendrix biopic, written and directed by John Ridley. Promisingly, Ridley won an Oscar for his screenplay to 12 Years a Slave. Less promisingly, on this evidence, he’d struggle to direct his way out of a telephone box.


Jimi: All is By My Side is a bloody disaster area. It makes The Boat that Rocked look like a masterpiece. It makes Oliver Stone's The Doors look nuanced. It makes Hippie Hippie Shake look like a model of truth and beauty. And Hippie Hippie Shake hasn’t even been released because it's so bad.

Mainly, it manages to render one of the most exciting twelve months in James Marshall Hendrix's life seem like the dreariest non-event in rock history.

Here’s how it fails in 15 different ways:

Can You See Me:
It can’t decide whether it’s a straight biopic; a patchouli-scented love-triangle drama; a wrist-hacking arthouse movie about self-identity; or even a peculiarly feminist take on the Hendrix legend. The shapeless editing and stilted script probably doesn’t help.

Hey Ya-ndrix:
André Benjamin’s charisma-free Jimi is less ‘gentle giant’ than ‘shambling, mumbling doofus’, pulled this way and that by controlling mentors, or bogged down with squabbling girlfriends.

Star-Strangled Clamour:
In truth, it’s not really a problem that the Hendrix estate refused to let the filmmakers include a single note of his recorded output. Oh no, hang on, it’s a MASSIVE ****ing problem. An attempt’s been made to plug the gap with a few cod-psychedelic stylings from session guitarist Waddy Wachtel – but Hendrix-virgins will probably wonder what all the fuss was about.

Dope-pelgängers:
Pretty much everybody’s introduced with on-screen title captions, and frankly, we don’t half need them. I mean, is that Macca or Mama Cass? It’s hard to tell. To be fair, most of them just look like members of a Britpop tribute band.

Dire-alogue:
With doozies like, “When the power of love takes over the love of power, that’s when things will change”, can this really be from the pen of the guy who wrote 12 Years a Slave? Three Kings? Team Knight Rider?

Kathy Etchingham:
To get an idea of exactly how much the filmmakers have pissed off Hendrix’s former lover with their depiction of her (a banshee-like Hayley Atwell), head straight over to Etchingham’s own website. It’s probably fair to say she won’t be renting this from LoveFilm anytime soon.

Michael Jeffery:
This ludicrous – if mercifully brief – portrayal of The Jimi Hendrix Experience’s co-manager (and reputed former MI6 agent) recalls nobody so much as ‘Ron Decline’ from the Rutles.

Michael X:
In real life, Hendrix was courted by the Black Panthers – though he’d generally pay more lip service to peace and love than revolution. Hence the purely fictitious scene in which he charmingly argues the toss with (real-life) Black Power leader-cum-hustler Michael X. It’s an interesting talking point, but feels like it belongs in another movie altogether.

Are You Experienced:
Given this was a creatively fertile period for Hendrix, the decision not to portray some sense of that artistic process – even just by having him doodle a happy space alien on the back of a Rice Krispies packet – seems a bit perverse.

Manic Depression:
In fact, for seemingly interminable stretches, Hendrix is simply confined to moping around his London flat while Kathy goes shopping or something. Perhaps Ridley’s trying to show the sheer ennui of life between gigs; a genius snared by domesticity and essence-sapping muses. But, you know, this is supposed to be a film about Jimi Hendrix. Not Noel Gallagher circa 1998. Where's the fire? Where's the spunk?

More to the point, where's the volume control?
Every so often, the audio just drops out: another pointless, arty contrivance that adds literally nothing to the drama.

Noises off:
When not muting the action, Ridley’s repeatedly misaligning the dubbing. He’s clearly aiming for ‘disorientating and druggy’ – but it just makes everything look like a 1970s Kung Fu flick.

Swingeing London:
Sure, the budget was tight, but London’s Summer of Love surely deserves more than a quick rummage in a thrift-store to the strains of Itchycoo Park.

I Just Called to Say I Hate You:
The moment when Hendrix, completely out of character, batters Kathy senseless with a pay-phone receiver – an incident the real Etchingham flat-out denies. As she relates on her website, after protesting to the producers, they “replied that it was true because they had ‘thoroughly researched me.’ In other words they were saying that they were telling the truth and I was not.”

Monterey Flop:
Having endured all the above for two hours, our one hope of being finally rewarded with a flambéed Stratocaster is extinguished under heel like the world's skinniest joint, when just as Hendrix saunters through London Heathrow en route to Monterey… the film suddenly turns itself off like a tap. Bye bye. Piss off. Oh, and just to rub it in further, here's Benjamin singing Wild Thing over the credits.




Jimi: All Is By My Side is out in the UK on October 24.
 

Phil B.

Far Out Man!
Joined
Sep 22, 2010
Posts
9,576
Reaction score
140
Location
Tejas
I said it before in other posts, but I knew when the Hendrix family blocked musical rights, this would be a fiasco.

I have pretty much given up on a decent biography of the man on film. Once the money hungry denizens took over his legacy, the decisions have been dubious at best.

Bottom line for me is that Jimi was not a pop hero in the sense we know it today. He was part of a huge movement musically, and in that sense, he succeeded in sharing his vision with us.
 

Sharp Dressed Man

Down South Jukin'
Joined
Oct 9, 2013
Posts
15,233
Reaction score
10,417
Location
Denmark (Living in Greece)
I said it before in other posts, but I knew when the Hendrix family blocked musical rights, this would be a fiasco.

I have pretty much given up on a decent biography of the man on film. Once the money hungry denizens took over his legacy, the decisions have been dubious at best.

Bottom line for me is that Jimi was not a pop hero in the sense we know it today. He was part of a huge movement musically, and in that sense, he succeeded in sharing his vision with us.

Excellent post, @Phil B.! I Couldn't agree more!
 

Sunny

Settled down at last and very happy.
Joined
Jan 1, 2010
Posts
15,725
Reaction score
182
Location
On a far away island .....
I kind of thought it would be rubbish. I have never seen any bio movies about rock singers that were any good.

I wouldn't have gone to see All Is By My Side anyway. I prefer to get my Jimi experiences on youtube and on vinyl.
 

rollingstoned

Queens of the Stone Age
Joined
Nov 2, 2008
Posts
3,801
Reaction score
7
Location
Cleveland, Ohio
I said it before in other posts, but I knew when the Hendrix family blocked musical rights, this would be a fiasco.

I have pretty much given up on a decent biography of the man on film. Once the money hungry denizens took over his legacy, the decisions have been dubious at best.

Greedy sons of bitches...
 

Hurdy Gurdy Man

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2013
Posts
911
Reaction score
64
So sad how the family of someone who was so ANTI-establishment should turn out to be full of greed and self interest.That's quite a paradox going on there.....................
 

rollingstoned

Queens of the Stone Age
Joined
Nov 2, 2008
Posts
3,801
Reaction score
7
Location
Cleveland, Ohio
So sad how the family of someone who was so ANTI-establishment should turn out to be full of greed and self interest.That's quite a paradox going on there.....................

They are just trying to get as much money as possible out of Jimi's name. I bet Jimi is up in heaven nodding his head in disapproval. I can't imagine doing that to a loved one...Someone who is FAMILY.
 

Hurdy Gurdy Man

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2013
Posts
911
Reaction score
64
I can understand protecting against what the family might view as improper use of Jimi's image and music,but this hardly lends credence to take advantage of every opportunity to cash in.As far as the new bio-pic is concerned,I hope they really got things right.I myself am getting sick and tired of all the narrow minded jerks who seem to belive with all sincerity that outside the music,Hendrix was nothing more than a filthy hippie burn out.I've seen clips of his appearance on "Dick Cavett" from not long before he died and let me tell you,the man was no burn out or stooge of any kind.Many have also erroneously viewed Janis Joplin in the same manner.I just don't know how people receive these ridiculous notions.Why were they freaks,because they dressed and sang differently and "dared" oppose the establishment.Patently absurd.These people made major contributions to art that in turn deeply affected the world perceptions of many youngsters back in the '60's and even beyond just maybe to a lesser degree.................
 

Hurdy Gurdy Man

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2013
Posts
911
Reaction score
64
Whoa!Jimi holding a Lenny Bruce record.A meeting of two great countercultural minds.I'll bet Mr. Hendrix adored Bruce's sometimes toxic anti-establishment comedic tone........................
 

Find member

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
31,575
Posts
1,126,150
Members
6,628
Latest member
Buckeye Randy

Staff online

Members online

Top