Re: Cover song that are substantially better than the original
^^LG is fine Cream'd.
I have no problem with anyone saying what they think as long as they don't insult anyone personally while expressing themselves, that is what the forum is for.
However, some people I have run into since I've been doing this never have anything positive to say about anything, except their own little microcosm of bands artists that they like and they take umbrage whenever someone criticizes them for any reason. I'm not saying you are one of those kind of posters but that kind of negative approach wears on me rather fast. If someone writes a thread about a band I don't like, the most I will do is compliment them on a well written OP and say I am not a fan and move on.
As far as the song you posted, I think Zeppelin has done better covers of many old blues songs than the originals, and I have no doubt some people will jump in and remind us about the controversy concerning their debut not crediting the authors until later pressings were released.
^^LG is fine Cream'd.
I have no problem with anyone saying what they think as long as they don't insult anyone personally while expressing themselves, that is what the forum is for.
However, some people I have run into since I've been doing this never have anything positive to say about anything, except their own little microcosm of bands artists that they like and they take umbrage whenever someone criticizes them for any reason. I'm not saying you are one of those kind of posters but that kind of negative approach wears on me rather fast. If someone writes a thread about a band I don't like, the most I will do is compliment them on a well written OP and say I am not a fan and move on.
As far as the song you posted, I think Zeppelin has done better covers of many old blues songs than the originals, and I have no doubt some people will jump in and remind us about the controversy concerning their debut not crediting the authors until later pressings were released.