Perfect length of a studio album

rtbuck

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2009
Posts
2,385
Reaction score
69
Location
I live in Buffalo, NY
How long or how many songs do you feel a studio album needs to be?

No doubt there are some great double studio albums out there but on the average how long or how many songs should a studio album be?

Take for instance (& this is only my opinion) 'Black Ice' by AC/DC. I felt it was a good album but it had too many songs on it. I never really could sit & listen to the whole thing straight through
 

OptimisticFutureBlues

Pschonautic Outlaw
Joined
Sep 29, 2010
Posts
486
Reaction score
2
Location
Gilbert, Arizona
^ I completely agree with the new AC/DC album. They did run the extra lap on that one. Has some great tracks on it though.

To me a good album has about 10 songs. Depending on the length, you could even shorten it to 8 if they are long songs. It cant be too long, well I don't know. See that's just my opinion. I guess it could go on for as long as you want it to, you have to keep the interest of the listener though. For example Jimi Hendrix's 'Electric Ladyland' is a long one, but its engaging the whole way through. The extra distance from start to finish made it more of a journey.
 

LG

Fade To Black
Joined
Apr 20, 2009
Posts
36,862
Reaction score
73
I admit it has taken me some time to get used to the extra tracks on CD's having grown up with 40 minute LP's Bucky.

It depends on the band I guess, some have depth and enough quality to easily fill a double CD, Ayreon's Electric Castle comes to mind as an example. Others like you said seem to have some "filler" and have songs that would never have made the grade in the old days. The industry has changed though, it used to be One album/year by contractual obligation during the vinyl era, and now bands take two years or longer to record an album, and I have never seen so many Live albums issued to keep fans interested as the last 10+ years. If the band can use the 80 minutes on a CD with great material that's fine with me, but when I am in my cups playing my old albums there is something that just resonates with a 40 minute sitting and then off to the next one.:grinthumb
 

snowblue

Senior Member
Joined
May 21, 2010
Posts
1,493
Reaction score
28
Location
UK
I tend to agree, LG.

40 minutes an album (preferably a gatefold cover so I have something to look at while I'm listening, and a booklet with the lyrics too) and 4 or 5 songs on each side.......are we getting old or what? :rolleyes: :oyea:
 

LG

Fade To Black
Joined
Apr 20, 2009
Posts
36,862
Reaction score
73
^^Yep our age and bias is definitely showing I have to say Snowblue...:D

One thing that does irritate me about CD's is the typeset some of them use, for Gawd's Sake use Large Bold Fonts when you print the damn things, I actually have to use a magnifying glass to read some of the information on them.(I'll bet some of you thought I was going to say "monocle"...:heheh:)
 

joe

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2010
Posts
6,717
Reaction score
1,597
Location
Cascadia
I've been thinking about doing a poll on album release frequency vs. musical duration content. For example, back in the 60's, 70's, and most of the eighties artists usually issued an album on a yearly average with about 40 minutes of content to fit on a Lp.

With the introduction of the CD with the capacity of around 80 minutes it seems a lot of artists release an album every 2-3 years or more.

To answer the question I'm going down the middle and say 60 minutes.
 

Magic

Woman of the World
Staff member
Administrator
Joined
Apr 20, 2009
Posts
25,089
Reaction score
4,882
Location
Ohio, USA
Perfect length and time = 45 minute with approximately 10-12 songs.
 

Groovy Man

I'm Not Like Everybody Else
Joined
Jan 18, 2010
Posts
6,298
Reaction score
14
Location
Long Island, N.Y.
I sometimes feel like nowadays (and in the last 10-20 years), as far as ''new releases'' go - a lot of the time, bands put too many songs on the album, and sometimes it waters down the quality of the album. Too many songs can turn a ''great'' album, into just a ''good'' album.

I think the best 10 - 11 songs should be chosen, and keep the album anywhere from 45 - 50 minutes, in my opinion.

Then again, there are few exceptions, like Tom Petty's ''Wildflowers'' album. 15 great songs, clocking in at 62 minutes and 48 seconds.

Good albums, like The Rolling Stones ''Voodoo Lounge'' and ''A Bigger Bang'' could of been great albums, if they had 10 or 11 songs, instead of 15-16 songs.

For example Jimi Hendrix's 'Electric Ladyland' is a long one, but its engaging the whole way through. The extra distance from start to finish made it more of a journey.

Well...''Electric Ladyland'' was a 2 record set, but as you said the journey from side one to the last track on side 4 is well worth the trip.

hippie.gif
 

Find member

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
30,740
Posts
1,069,971
Members
6,373
Latest member
Hannibal37

Members online

Top