Great post, however it evades the real question: would that version of the band be a legitimate representation of Skynyrd!?
A band is like a great story. All it takes is one person who was there when it happened to pass down the essential information and spirit of what makes that story to keep it going. A great story never dies because people don't let it die. That's why when people go see Lynrd Skynyrd they still sing along like they were seeing the only version of Lynyrd Skynyrd that's important. It's because the songs still live on and those are the "Storytellers" who are the ones who are qualified to pass it down.
A band is like a great story. All it takes is one person who was there when it happened to pass down the essential information and spirit of what makes that story to keep it going. A great story never dies because people don't let it die. That's why when people go see Lynyrd Skynyrd they still sing along like they were seeing the only version of Lynyrd Skynyrd that's important. It's because the songs still live on and those are the "Storytellers" who are the ones who are qualified to pass it down.
Peter Green is the best example in this thred. It should also be noted that Phil had nothing to do with the name Thin Lizzy.
No, Peter Green is not a good example at all. Peter Green played on only the first three Feetwood Mac records. Phil Lynott played and sang on every Thin Lizzy record except the posthumous live record the tribute version released.
Peter Green was the one who put Fleetwood Mac together though. The reason he named the band Fleetwood Mac was to induce Mick Fleetwood and John McVie to leave John Mayall & the Bluesbreakers and join his band. Peter was definitely the leader, until he took one acid trip too many.
:
And it seems to me that he was on more than 3 albums, btw.