aeroplane
In Urgent Need of Advice
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2010
- Posts
- 1,842
- Reaction score
- 0
and what's so bad about these bands? personally bands like Talking Heads, Sonic Youth, Joy Division, R.E.M., the Patti Smith Band, and Blondie were doing much more interesting things than the same old rehashed rock that Van Halen and AC/DC were throwing out there. i think foxhound summed it up best, Led Zep imitators without any blues. did they make good music? yeah sure, it wasn't bad. but it certainly wasn't as ground breaking or innovative as you make it out to be
I am sure you'll find that Eddie Van Halen and Angus Young inspired more people to want to play guitar than whoever was playing guitar for Talking Heads, Joy Division, R.E.M. or Sonic Youth. And I admit it, I'll be damned if I know who was playing guitar for any of those latter 4, given for the most part their band members are as anonymous as John Doe.
I'd expect you'll also find that more people wanted to be like David Lee Roth, Bon Scott or Brian Johnson than Michael Stipe.
I've got nothing against any of those bands you mention. However, most people have to admit that groups like Van Halen or AC/DC simply have more of a "presence" and aura about them. They are true rock stars.
Nearly any rock fan can name ALL the members of Van Halen or AC/DC (except during the odd periods that Phil Rudd wasn't in the band) pretty much right off the top of their head.
Meanwhile most people trying to name all the members of Sonic Youth, R.E.M., Joy Division or Talking Heads is most definitely going to have to pull out an album sleeve or look it up on the internet. On that level, those groups are a little more faceless than VH or AC/DC.
People can form the opinion that bands like Bauhaus, Nine Inch Nails and KMFDM are more "original" than Led Zeppelin or the Beatles, just for the fun of it, but again at least people can name the members of Led Zeppelin or the Beatles without looking it up.
Last edited:



