5 bands that deserve to play the Superbowl instead of Madonna

That 70s Guy

Super Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
Joined
Jan 21, 2010
Posts
16,525
Reaction score
6,511
Location
Nova Scotia Canada
ultimateclassicrock.com



Five Bands That Should Be Performing at Super Bowl 46 Instead of Madonna
by: Dave Lifton
John Mellencamp / Madonna / David Lee Roth

Mike Coppola / Scott Halleran / Frazer Harrison, Getty Images

Let’s face it, very few rock fans are excited about seeing Madonna perform the halftime show at this year’s Super Bowl. Between her exercise regimen and all the plastic surgery she’s had recently, you’d think the National Football League wouldn’t want to feature someone who’ll scare all the children watching.

So who’s got the chops to follow in the footsteps of the rock stars who’ve done such a good job in this big spotlight in the past? Well, we have some suggestions — here’s Five Bands That Should Be Performing at Super Bowl 46 Instead of Madonna:

5) Guns N’ Roses

It doesn’t matter if it’s with the current band or if they go all-out and reunite, Axl Rose remains one of the most compelling frontmen in rock history, and everybody always wants to see what he’s going to do next. ‘Welcome To The Jungle,’ ‘Sweet Child O’Mine” and Paradise City’ were written to get huge crowds on their feet, they wouldn’t even need a fourth song. On the other hand, the show runs on a very tight schedule, and punctuality isn’t, you know, one of Axl’s specialties. Still, Vegas could clean up by offering odds on the length of the inevitable delay.



4) Bob Seger

He just finished a North American tour, so his band and voice have to still be in good shape. As we reported back in November, he’s currently writing material for a new album, but that doesn’t mean he can’t leave his beloved Michigan for a few days and sing for a billion people around the world, does it? While the other great American rockers of his generation (Springsteen, Petty, Mellencamp) maintain active schedules, Seger’s star has unjustly fallen due to relative inactivity. A halftime show with high-energy classics like ‘Hollywood Nights,’ ‘Rock and Roll Never Forgets,’ ‘Katmandu’ and, of course, ‘Old Time Rock and Roll,’ could go a long way towards reminding everybody what a great performer he is. Just please, no ‘Like A Rock.’ It was the original ‘Our Country’ (see below).



3) Kiss

The Super Bowl is the country’s biggest spectacle, so why not have the band whose entire career has been a spectacle? Every stadium in America already plays ‘Rock and Roll All Night’ or ‘Shout It Out Loud’ at some point during every single sporting event, so why not have Kiss there in the flesh to do those and a few others? And don’t you think Gene Simmons would love to be surrounded by the Patriots’ cheerleaders? The only drawback could be that, with a 12-minute set, it could take longer for them to get into their costumes and makeup than to perform.



2) Van Halen

With a new album (‘A Different Kind of Truth,’ reviewed here) coming out two days after the game and a tour to promote, the timing couldn’t be more perfect to get them in front of a worldwide audience. Just throw one of the new songs in with ‘Jump,’ ‘Panama’ and ‘Unchained’ and watch the ticket sales increase. And it’s best to get them now, while Dave and Eddie are still presumably talking to each other.


1) John Mellencamp

A Super Bowl taking place in Indianapolis without a performance by the most famous rockin’ Hoosier? After the season the Colts have had, it’s the least the NFL could have done for the hometown crowd. Besides, a set comprised of stadium-friendly anthems like ‘Small Town,’ ‘R.O.C.K. in the U.S.A.’ ‘Paper In Fire,’ and ‘Authority Song’ would go a long way towards making us forget that the Chevrolet commercial that used ‘Our Country’ was played during every single commercial break in every single football game during the 2006 season. The league blew this one like Tony Romo in the fourth quarter.
 

AboutAGirl

oh, be nice
Joined
Apr 21, 2005
Posts
2,693
Reaction score
11
I don't like Madonna at all, I don't mind if I never hear her music again... but hey IMHO, I wouldn't say all those bands deserve to play the super bowl, let alone in place of her. The Super Bowl half time show is all about the big ole' spectacle and Madonna is up there in the highest echelon on that scale. In terms of the Super Bowl she basically combines the universal pop appeal of the recent modern acts with the timelessness and decades of fans that the recent classic acts brought to it, best of both worlds.

Not sure I'd count Kiss or Mellencamp as being quite big enough for an ideal super bowl show. I mean, they're close, but before we go there I'd say we should look at maybe having Metallica, The Eagles, Santana, Aerosmith, AC/DC, Elton John, or Billy Joel.
 

TheFeldster

Mr Kite
Joined
Dec 29, 2009
Posts
4,168
Reaction score
10
Location
Adelaide, South Australia
Kiss is definitely big enough, but from my perspective Seger and Mellencamp are below the bands listed by AAG in the pecking order for a "world" spectacle. (I put world in quotations here, since it's only a vast minority in the countries that aren't American that get too excited about the Superbowl).

And while I don't personally like Madonna, she has done enough to be classed as a world-famous act. I just won't bother tuning in this year, doesn't particularly bother me.
 

LG

Fade To Black
Joined
Apr 20, 2009
Posts
36,862
Reaction score
73
Has Stevie Wonder ever performed at the Super Bowl...:hm:

JG posted the same list in her thread about the halftime show.

It's time for the corporation known as the NFL to grow a pair and start putting younger rock/metal bands in the half time slot. Enough trotting out all the old superstars who have all seen their prime come and go years ago. Not saying they can't still perform, but it's time for a change of the guard.
 

TheSound

An Englishman in New York
Joined
Feb 23, 2011
Posts
2,726
Reaction score
2
Location
Manhattan, New York City, USA
Let’s face it, very few rock fans are excited about seeing Madonna perform the halftime show at this year’s Super Bowl. Between her exercise regimen and all the plastic surgery she’s had recently, you’d think the National Football League wouldn’t want to feature someone who’ll scare all the children watching..

Of course they aren't, she's not a "Rock" artist, that's like saying very few skinhead gang members would be getting excited about watching a half-time feature on the life of Mahatma Ghandi. The Super Bowl half time show on Sunday is aimed at a half a billion world wide TV audience - most of whom I guarantee will love it - not the King Crimson Appreciation Society. So to give my own personal answer to this question is easy... nobody imo "deserves" to play the half-time show more than Madonna does, period, because only Elvis, The Beatles, and Michael Jackson have ever sold more records than she has in the entire history of popular music, so why wouldn't they invite Madonna? The networks and commercial companies spend million on advertising around half-time, so they want an act on at half-time that millions of people are going to sit in their seats and watch for 15-20 minutes. She certainly "deserves" it whether the world's head bangers and hippies like her music or not, the woman is probably more famous and recognisable than any other female alive. I thought I was a hip "counter culture" kid for my age, but I have nothing on some people who seem to hate anything that was, at one point, popular.
 

TheSound

An Englishman in New York
Joined
Feb 23, 2011
Posts
2,726
Reaction score
2
Location
Manhattan, New York City, USA
Hey, all you rocker's concerns about Madonna The Queen of Pop doing the Superbowl half-time show are over, you can relax and breath again, coz I just heard that bearded drug-addled pot-bellied 70's head-banger Kelly Clarkson has been invited to sing the National Anthem! :bird
 

Find member

Forum statistics

Threads
30,739
Posts
1,069,893
Members
6,374
Latest member
nowiknowitsJAG

Staff online

Members online

Top