Bands or musicians who strayed far from their roots

Soot and Stars

I AM SOOT!
Joined
Sep 23, 2009
Posts
16,434
Reaction score
123
Location
Small Town NH, USA
Beck is one of the most versatile and talented artists in the history of music IMO. He defines eclectic. He probably allienates many who liked an album because he will do a complete 360 the next. I admire that he has to balls to make music he wants to make and never ever give in to what might sell or a particular audience.

I agree as well! I may be one of the only people I know who is a fan of his slow depressing folk album

Sea Changes
beck-sea-change.jpg
 

Foxhound

retired
Joined
Sep 22, 2009
Posts
3,584
Reaction score
8
Location
Toronto, Canada
The music of the Rolling Stones also evolved enormously from "December's Children" of 1965:

51qHbWeAHBL.jpg

To "Their Satanic Majesties Request" of 1967:

6bf2e03ae7a0264183ced110.L.jpg

And then again to "Let It Bleed" in 1971:

86e5a2c008a0b56a17a2c010.L.jpg

"Let It Bleed" also happens to include the track "You Can't Always Get What You Want", which doesn't really fit anywhere within the Stones' catalogue.

:pirate:
 
Last edited:

Soot and Stars

I AM SOOT!
Joined
Sep 23, 2009
Posts
16,434
Reaction score
123
Location
Small Town NH, USA
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

As a Stones novice what were the change in styles musically between those albums if you don't mind me asking Fox? When you really like a band you have an ear for this stuff and when I sift through my 40 Licks c.d. I have no complaints but I can only here what I consider the Stones sound. I don't necessarily hear the progression and genre hopping and I think it's cool to hear these things from fans. It tends to get me to listen more closely to artist. :)
 

Foxhound

retired
Joined
Sep 22, 2009
Posts
3,584
Reaction score
8
Location
Toronto, Canada
"December's Children" can be considered to be the last of the early Rolling Stones' albums. Like the earlier albums, it mixed hit singles, which by this time were written by Mick Jagger and Keith Richards:







With standard/classic rhythm & blues covers:





:rock:
 
Last edited:

Foxhound

retired
Joined
Sep 22, 2009
Posts
3,584
Reaction score
8
Location
Toronto, Canada
"Their Satanic Majesties Request" was very different. It was the Stones' third album in a row since "December's Children" wherein all tracks were Stones' compositions. With "Their Satanic Majesties Request" the Stones fully immersed themselves in the experimental psychedelic sound with which they'd been toying in previous singles such as "19th Nervous Breakdown", "Paint It Black", "Have You Seen Your Mother Baby, Standing in the Shadow?", "Ruby Tuesday" and "We Love You". Listen to these tracks which are totally unlike those which they were recording just two years previously:









:phones:
 
Last edited:

Foxhound

retired
Joined
Sep 22, 2009
Posts
3,584
Reaction score
8
Location
Toronto, Canada
"Beggars Banquet", the album which followed "Their Satanic Majesties Request", mixed in experimental compositions such as "Sympathy for the Devil", "Salt of the Earth" and "Street Fighting Man" with bluesier compositions of their own such as "Stray Cat Blues", "Parachute Woman" and "No Expectations".

"Let It Bleed", however, was a thoroughly blues infused release with the exception of the "Country Honk" and "You Can't Always Get What You Want" tracks (neither of which I like although admittedly they do have their fans). The album is just dripping with blues-rock classics:











The Rolling Stones have basically followed the template they set for themselves with "Let It Bleed' ever since.

:pirate:
 
Last edited:

Foxhound

retired
Joined
Sep 22, 2009
Posts
3,584
Reaction score
8
Location
Toronto, Canada
Fleetwood Mac started life as a blues rock band.

After Peter Green and then Jeremy Spencer, followed by Danny Kirwan left .. the band that reformed continued to use the name Fleetwood Mac. Only now it was a commercial poppy band which had/has nothing in common with Peter Green's blues rock Fleetwood Mac.


:wa

I agree! Fleetwood Mac kept the same name but devolved from a fabulous blues rock band to a middle-of-the-road pop combo.

:wtf:
 

Mr. Bob Dobolina

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2011
Posts
3,715
Reaction score
22
Location
Pasadena, CA USA
How about the (Small) Faces? With Steve Marriott at the helm they went from being a mod, soul loving dance band to a psychedelic pop band. Once Marriott left and Rod Stewart and Ronnie Wood came aboard they became a boozy rock and roll party band. They rocked much harder as the Faces, although they did slow it down occasionally with acoustic folk tunes like "Sweet Lady Mary", "Debris" and "Ooh La La".
 

TheWhalerfan

Lovus My Avatarus
Joined
May 1, 2011
Posts
2,684
Reaction score
27
Location
Saskatchewan, Canada
Def Leppard. Start out as hard rock band, after success and a few albums end up wayyy too soft. Bleh. Waste of talent.

Aerosmith. Has been discussed many times.

Heart. No brainer for most (what ones remain) fans. Begin as talented hard rock outfit, end up bubble gum mush. Worked to pad bank account for a few years, but eventually made the band name somewhat of a joke - synonymous with the word sellout.
 

Find member

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
30,738
Posts
1,069,675
Members
6,373
Latest member
Murphy_orrest

Members online

Top