Aug 11, 2010 #2 Hepcat retired Joined Sep 18, 2009 Posts 3,409 Reaction score 9 Location Toronto, Ontario Ben E. King by light years!
Aug 11, 2010 #3 Soot and Stars I AM SOOT! Joined Sep 23, 2009 Posts 16,434 Reaction score 123 Location Small Town NH, USA Hepcat said: Ben E. King by light years! Click to expand... Agree on this one! Even avid Beatlemania shouldn't be able to back anything otherwise IMO!
Hepcat said: Ben E. King by light years! Click to expand... Agree on this one! Even avid Beatlemania shouldn't be able to back anything otherwise IMO!
Aug 11, 2010 #4 Astrid Kirchherr65 Classic 60's Chick Joined Mar 14, 2010 Posts 2,598 Reaction score 2 Location New England Totally Love John's version..but I know even he himself would pick Ben E. King..... So soulful. It's Ben E. King
Totally Love John's version..but I know even he himself would pick Ben E. King..... So soulful. It's Ben E. King
Aug 11, 2010 #5 BeatlesFan Senior Member Joined Mar 29, 2010 Posts 960 Reaction score 1 Location Toronto, Canada Lennon's cover is great. But I tend to prefer the originals, so my vote goes to Ben E. King.
Aug 11, 2010 #6 METALPRIEST Senior Member Joined Nov 28, 2009 Posts 33,603 Reaction score 70 Location U.S.A. Both great but I'll give one to Lennon because I play it more...not because it's better.
Aug 12, 2010 #7 That 70s Guy Super Moderator Staff member Super Moderator Joined Jan 21, 2010 Posts 16,541 Reaction score 6,562 Location Nova Scotia Canada Lennon hate the original.
Aug 12, 2010 #8 Groovy Man I'm Not Like Everybody Else Joined Jan 18, 2010 Posts 6,298 Reaction score 14 Location Long Island, N.Y. Lennon....original is ok...but Lennon....yeah.
Aug 12, 2010 #9 The Beatles retired Joined May 1, 2010 Posts 1,328 Reaction score 0 and were all tied up
Aug 12, 2010 #10 b.o.b. Senior Member Joined Jan 8, 2010 Posts 2,554 Reaction score 3 Location Romania john lennon