That's your opinion. IMO Slayer isn't all that great.
BTW......Slayer has no votes so.......I'm not the only one who thinks Slayer ain't that great.
That's your opinion. IMO Slayer isn't all that great.
BTW......Slayer has no votes so.......I'm not the only one who thinks Slayer ain't that great.
That's your opinion. IMO Slayer isn't all that great.
BTW......Slayer has no votes so.......I'm not the only one who thinks Slayer ain't that great.
You ain't the only one. Slayer are extremely overrated and their fanboys don't help. lol The 3 other bands having more diversity in their albums (even if I don't like all the albums) alone ranks them above Slayer for me.
So, you're saying Anthrax have more diversity than Slayer? Apart from changing vocalists, that's a joke, right? At least Slayer went through their whole nu/crossover-metal phase, which could be considered diverse, whether one liked it or not.
This post no longer counts either, because I just voted for Slayer!
Seriously, based on classic material, its close between Metallica, Slayer and Megadeth. Over the past 25+ years or so and up to Jeff Hanneman's death, I've definitely preferred Slayer's output, so thus, I gave them my vote. I have to add that Megadeth have also been miles ahead of Metallica as far as new albums goes in that same timespan.
Did I just ignore Anthrax? Honestly, great band, but just not up there with the other three in my book.
Based solely on the first 5 albums I would also pick Slayer with Megadeth close behind.
But overall I had to pick Megadeth because I'm not fond of that nu metal era.
And the band that is highly overrated here is by far Metallica ,IMO. A few great albums and a truck load of crappy ones.
Because few people here are Metal... poser