^^^ What the fans said ~
April 24, 2010, 10:33PM
I believe I heard him say ; he was sick. When he asked if he was up for it =he meant was he feeling better.Garfunkel has said he had lost his voice if you paid attention.
Posted by mlewis6
April 24, 2010, 11:13PM
Simon & Garfunkel weren't just for baby boomers today! I'm 18, and I felt like I was surrounded by people born way after "Bridge Over Trouble Water" came out. Everyone, young and old, was rocking out, singing every song, and enjoying themselves! Goes to show they are a true classic passing from one generation to the next!
Posted by surfpuckmd
April 24, 2010, 11:22PM
I thought they sounded really good. They didn't attempt the high notes but I wouldn't have expected them to. These were musical legends performing some of the most complex and beautiful songs in American history. Tens of thousands of people were singing along. This was one of my best Jazz Fest experiences. Art Garfunkel's admitted that he had laryngitis and still did great...this should not be judged as if it were American Idol.
Posted by pegoot
April 25, 2010, 1:40AM
For those who find the cost of a jazz fest ticket a little pricey, I found out online that Simon & Garfunkle are going on a Canadian tour. Tickets start at $240.
I'm in the "docker's demographic" and although Garfunkle's voice wasn't what it was in the sixties, just witnessing the performance of this great legend will stand out as one of my greatest Jazz Fest moments.
Posted by jpbadeaux
April 25, 2010, 7:00AM
Well hell, no, it's not the 1960's. Is anyone up to the challenge of sounding 40 years younger than they are? S&G was amazing.... Yes, they are older and yes, they can't sing like they used to (though Simon seems to be able to a bit more than G). Give them a break. As a previous poster said, some pay $240 to see them. They were lagniappe for us and I wouldn't have missed it for the world.... or $240 if that what's it would have taken me. No one can melt your heart like Art.
Posted by jpbadeaux
April 25, 2010, 7:08AM
Well hell, no, it's not the 1960's. Is anyone up to the challenge of sounding 40 years younger than they are? S&G was amazing.... Yes, they are older and yes, they can't sing like they used to (though Simon seems to be able to a bit more than G). Give them a break. As a previous poster said, some pay $240 to see them. They were lagniappe for us and I wouldn't have missed it for the world.... or $240 if that what's it would have taken me. No one can melt your heart like Art.
Posted by oracle2005
April 25, 2010, 8:05AM
I was there and enjoyed the performance and experience.
Live never sounds as good as a studio recording. Expecting it to sets one up for a disappointment.
I told those we went with exactly that and they said they knew that. They were going for the experience, one teenager in our group pointed out it will probably be the last time we get to see them live.
The questions and all that matters is was the audience satisfied? A resounding YES!
Posted by commander47
April 25, 2010, 8:18AM
A little to critical there Kieth; they were simply awesome!!!!
Posted by 429exit
April 25, 2010, 9:21AM
sorry there keith, the majority speeks. maybe you're just tone deaf.
Posted by lolarites
April 25, 2010, 10:03AM
You go right ahead and say what ever you want, Keith. We don't pay attention to anything you say anyway.
Posted by rickmorgan80
April 25, 2010, 10:26AM
Wow Keith, you have the most die hard S & G fans posting here. I was at the show and your description was completley accurate. I was looking forward to seeing them as they are one of the few I hadn't seen live. They made James Taylor seem like ozzy osbourn. You couldn't hear them because they were so low. Felt sorry for Art. They don't need to tour Canada. They need to retire. Great book of American classics. Simon though loves new Orleans and we love that. Art, we love you too.
Posted by Still Crazy
April 25, 2010, 10:32AM
.......time, time, time, see what's become of me.....
Posted by oracle2005
April 25, 2010, 10:44AM
I saw the Rolling Stones ~1975. Billy Preston stole the show. I was very disappointed, they were disorganized, out of tune and had no idea what they were going to play next.
It was then that I realized don't expect live to match the performance/sound of a studio, ain't gonna happen.
I also felt the Rolling Stones should retire back in 1975, but I was wrong.
The most important thing was the audience in 1975 was happy with the Stone's performance and so was everyone around me at Simon and Garfunkel yesterday.
I don't know of anyone who regreted going. If you want to hear what they sounded like in 1969 play an album. Digital even today leaves out a lot of the sound.
Posted by Grrlyfern
April 25, 2010, 1:23PM
Right you are. In a hoarse voice, garfunkel said to the crowd that he was having some trouble with his voice, and said 'But i'll do the best I can, OK?" and we all applauded.
wish I'd stuck around, but I left for the Jazz Tent after diamonds on the soles of my shoes--Simon hadn't cracked a smile once, and really hadn't warmed to the crowd, though he's played Fest before and is familiar with NOLA. I'm glad things warmed up--friends have said it got much much better.
osted by freelancer
April 25, 2010, 6:02PM
Garfunkel apologized mid-set for being sick and hoarse. In fact, he said he had considered canceling the performance because his voice was not at its best, but he said he just didn't want to miss his first Jazz Fest appearance. I think the crowd understood and was more than supportive. I personally appreciated his willingness to give it an effort, so even though his voice couldn't really do justice to songs like "Bridge Over Troubled Water," it didn't matter to me because Art gave it everything he had. Great show!
Posted by Patty
April 25, 2010, 7:54PM
I was there, and it was fantastic! It was a once in a lifetime chance to see these artists performing together again, live, and at the Jazz Fest! Wow. Too bad you, Keith, did not appreciate what you were witnessing. There were thousands of people there who did, as evidenced by their complete silence during "Bridge", and by the resounding cheering for Mr. Garfunkle. And not one but two encores.
Shame on you, Keith, for being so critical. A little respect goes a long way. You could learn to show some.