foreverblue
Senior Member
i like a few of their songs, expecially the post revolver stuff, but the beatles are more of a classic pop band pre 1966 - post 1966 [and post epstein , the suits, and the sillyness] they really became a classic rock band
IMHO, the Beatles were a "boy band" prior to '66 or '67. Once they really got into the drugs, they really turned from the poppy stuff and became a true-blue classic rock band.
Nirvana - I'm not even going to start,would take me hours to say why i think this group is overrated,allways top of my list of shit bands.
The Doors - I have several bootlegs of this group,shocking isn't the word,like listening to a very drunk man rambling complete nonsense in a pub,made up lyrical bullshit as he went along.
Sex Pistols - One good album,more an image thing than any lasting musical credibility
Oasis - A bad Manchester Beatles tribute band
Tom Petty - love him in the Traveling Wilburys,but his Best of album will do me for his solo work.Responsible for 5 or 6 of the best songs i've heard,but i find him a bit overrated
Agree with most of these except for Nirvana and Petty. Not because I like Petty either, but I don't ever hear anyone talking about him as a legend like you hear people say about Dylan, Neil Young or Springsteen. Most people who are considered rock and roll "experts" or "historians" seem to look at Petty as "good" but not much else. In fact, there has been very little buzz around him since the Wildflowers album, at least commercially.
One contemporary of Petty's who I find a little overrated is John Mellencamp actually. Bryan Adams (another contemporary) and Tom Petty have vanished from "popular culture" but Mellencamp is still getting into tv commercials, getting moderate coverage for new albums, etc.


The Police & Sting solo, I've never got it.