The Worst Musical Decade?

The Worst Musically Talented Decade. Choose one.

  • The 1950's

    Votes: 20 12.6%
  • The 1960's

    Votes: 1 0.6%
  • The 1970's

    Votes: 6 3.8%
  • The 1980's

    Votes: 32 20.1%
  • The 1990's

    Votes: 18 11.3%
  • The 2000's

    Votes: 82 51.6%

  • Total voters
    159

Cosmic Harmony

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2009
Posts
12,935
Reaction score
25
1966 to be precise. It's probably no coincidence that the album started rising in importance just at that time.

If you are saying that music went downhill when musicians started to release more than one song at a time then I have to think that that's hogwash.

You honestly believe the 50's were a worse musical decade then the last ten years?

I do, very much so. :flirt

2000s HANDS DOWN.

There may of been some bad musicians in the 80s and 90s, but seriously, look at this last decade. There has not been not ONE single great Mainstream musicians. FACT. For every good musician/group in the 2000s theres 500 bad ones. maybe more. All the mainstream artists are shit. Good mainstream artists in the 2000s don't go hand in hand.

80s had THRASH metal and stuff man, how could the 80s be the worst?
And the 50s had Elvis. Then look at all the bands famous in the 2000s... Justin Bieber, Chris Brown, T Pain, Nickelback, Fallout Boy, ETC. Every single one of them is shit.

Well someone is being awfully pessimistic. You can't define a decade just by who is successful in the mainstream. I mean if you just go with top 40 singles for example then Janis Joplin, Frank Zappa, Jimi Hendrix, Emerson, Lake & Palmer, Rush, The Velvet Underground, The Grateful Dead, and many other are just flash in the pan, one hit wonders.

Try looking at the glass half full and looking for good bands instead of mulling over the ones you don't like. I promise you, there are great bands out there from the 2000's. :D
 

troggy

aka Billy Bubba
Joined
Sep 24, 2009
Posts
296
Reaction score
1
If you are saying that music went downhill when musicians started to release more than one song at a time then I have to think that that's hogwash.

That's what I'm saying. It wasn't all tied to the album but a lot of it was.
 

The Beatles

retired
Joined
May 1, 2010
Posts
1,328
Reaction score
0
Nah... 70s were better. Floyd, Zep, Neil, even my favorite Doors album is from '71.

Floyd, Zep, Neil,


counter that with


the beatles, the rolling stones, the beach boys

also:

Monkees
The Rascals
Bob Dylan
Jimi Hendrix
Elvis
The Who
The Byrds
The Doors (debut, best album of theirs)
Cream
The Animals
The Kinks
The Hollies
 

Cosmic Harmony

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2009
Posts
12,935
Reaction score
25
That's what I'm saying. It wasn't all tied to the album but a lot of it was.

Well then that means I have to think that that's hogwash. :heheh:

Floyd, Zep, Neil,


counter that with


the beatles, the rolling stones, the beach boys

also:

Monkees
The Rascals
Bob Dylan
Jimi Hendrix
Elvis
The Who
The Byrds
The Doors (debut, best album of theirs)
Cream
The Animals
The Kinks
The Hollies

Yeah, three vs. fifteen. Those seem like fair odds. :bonk: :heheh:
 

troggy

aka Billy Bubba
Joined
Sep 24, 2009
Posts
296
Reaction score
1
Well then that means I have to think that that's hogwash. :heheh:

The singles themselves started going downhill at that time. Whether you agree or not, music changed as the album grew in importance. The only argument would be whether it changed for the better or worse.
 

0000

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2008
Posts
5,316
Reaction score
10
Location
I
The singles themselves started going downhill at that time. Whether you agree or not, music changed as the album grew in importance. The only argument would be whether it changed for the better or worse.

And what sense does it make to argue two differing opinions.. personal preferences can not be fact.. the argument goes no where.. discussion can go on forever though...:heheh::flirt:

I personally think it changed for the better.. the music grew and evolved.. I can now listen to an hour of music and enjoy it rather than 3 minutes on the radio:grinthumb

I am definitely an album man, I love finding the hidden gems.. If you don't take my word for it:D
http://www.classicrockforums.com/forum/f23/ebergs-playlists-5679/index6.html
That thread should be proof:heheh:
 

AboutAGirl

oh, be nice
Joined
Apr 21, 2005
Posts
2,693
Reaction score
11
the beatles, the rolling stones, the beach boys

Don't like Beach Boys in the least. I like The Stones and he Beatles a lot but for me personally it'd take a million of each to compare to Neil and Floyd.

Monkees
The Rascals
Elvis
The Animals
The Kinks
The Hollies

No thanks. I'd rather listen to Avril Lavigne.

Bob Dylan
Jimi Hendrix

:cheers2 I'll give you those two. Although much of my favorite Dylan work is from the 70s.

The Doors (debut, best album of theirs)

Not even close. All their albums are good but LA Woman would be in my top 5 of all-time and the next Doors album you're going to see on that list would be about 50 albums down the line...

The Who
The Byrds
Cream

Meh, they a'ght. I'll take Skynyrd, NON, Yes, Sabbath, Bowie, Ten Years After, Petty.

To be sure, 68-72 would be my peak Classic Rock years. The 90s are my all-time favorite decade, though. Everything was at its best, from classic rock to metal to pop to indie to alt-rock to rap even...
 

troggy

aka Billy Bubba
Joined
Sep 24, 2009
Posts
296
Reaction score
1
And what sense does it make to argue two differing opinions.. personal preferences can not be fact.. the argument goes no where.. discussion can go on forever though...:heheh::flirt:

Then why do you turn right around and argue the point below?

I personally think it changed for the better.. the music grew and evolved.. I can now listen to an hour of music and enjoy it rather than 3 minutes on the radio:grinthumb

That's largely an archaic point of view, especially in this day and age. You could put together a much better playlist with an mp3 player than simply by throwing on an album, if all you want is music that you enjoy.

I am definitely an album man, I love finding the hidden gems.. If you don't take my word for it:D
http://www.classicrockforums.com/forum/f23/ebergs-playlists-5679/index6.html
That thread should be proof:heheh:

Yes, I love that kind of stuff too. But even here you're talking individual songs and not whole albums.
 

AboutAGirl

oh, be nice
Joined
Apr 21, 2005
Posts
2,693
Reaction score
11
That's largely an archaic point of view, especially in this day and age. You could put together a much better playlist with an mp3 player than simply by throwing on an album, if all you want is music that you enjoy.

But there's soooo much more to it than that. There are a million songs that I'd barely appreciate on a shuffle list, but they are incredible pieces of art in the context of a consequential album. :D

A record can mean more than the sum of the tracks.
 

Find member

Forum statistics

Threads
30,734
Posts
1,069,421
Members
6,373
Latest member
WaldoFrey

Members online

No members online now.
Top