The death of "The Greatest Hits" album

That 70s Guy

Super Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
Joined
Jan 21, 2010
Posts
16,512
Reaction score
6,495
Location
Nova Scotia Canada
http://ajournalofmusicalthings.com

Beatles-1967-1970.jpg

Another side effect of the rise of streaming: The death of the greatest hits album.
“It’s flash cash,” a record company executive told me years ago. “Greatest hits albums are great for two things: some quick and easy sales leading up to Christmas and for killing off a record deal with a band you know will be leaving the label.”

“Say what?” I replied.

“Sure! A greatest hits release can count towards a band’s contractual obligation. If they’re signed to provide seven albums–as was the standard for so many years–and things go south and we can’t or won’t resign them, we can kill off the contract by making that seventh record a greatest hits collection. Either way, we can make a lot of cash from these things. We love them.”

He was right. I used to buy a lot of these things when I was spinning in clubs. It made far more economic sense to buy a collection of big singles than the individual albums. It was also a great way to get caught up on a band that already had a deep catalogue. Start with a CD of their big hits and then pick which full albums you wanted to explore further.

For example, how many people were introduced to the Beatles through their famous Red and Blue collections?

But consider this: in the age of streaming–that is, the post-CD age–is there a need for the greatest hits record anymore? Anyone can create a greatest hits playlist with just a few clicks. And chances are you can probably find someone who has already done this for just about any artist you can name.

So is the greatest hits CD dead? Maybe in the traditional sense, the kind that the record executive was talking about. But curated collections of an artist’s work? That will live on in the form of reissues and box sets.

The BBC has more.

So does this mean that the music reissue market is dead? Well, not exactly.

In the past, album collections were aimed at a general audience that had a casual interest in the music and was not prepared to wade through every album by a singer or band.

Now they are designed for a specialist audience that wants to dig deeper.

That means multi-disc box sets that are not so much compiled as “curated”, often with a weighty book attached that contains archive photos and a mini-history lesson of the artist’s career. The key is context, something that a streaming service can never provide.

Read more here.
 

Lynch

Here for the cookies and the tunes
Joined
Jan 5, 2010
Posts
32,251
Reaction score
11,187
Location
The Land of Sky Blue Waters
Most Greatest Hits albums and Best Of albums are nothing more than the same 8 or 9 songs rehashed with a couple of different songs in the mix. If we are really unlucky, they'll add a song or three that isn't on ANY other album, usually a crummy song and it wastes space.

The recording industry is so full of itself and is such a money-driven industry that it makes me ill. There are a few artists that I discovered (or further discovered) solely because I had purchased a best of/greatest hits album and I wanted to know more, but that's the exception, not the rule.


Then there are bands (and record companies) that completely ruin the industry in ways because all they do is pump out one after another of these greatest hits albums. Perfect example, Thin Lizzy.

upload_2018-2-7_21-25-20.png

12 studios, 12 live and 34 best ofs? THIRTY FOUR!?!? GTFO with that BS!


The Beatles fall into the same/similar category, but I can give them a bit more of a pass simply because they were possibly the single-most-influential band and piece of pop culture ever created, certainly in the 20th century.

upload_2018-2-7_21-28-16.png

A couple of these numbers are misleading. 23 studio albums? Yeah, I guess if you consider they only released 12 or 13 total albums, but had different versions of each for the US and the UK. But 23? Nope, no, they didn't. Also, 21 EPs is also incorrect. Half of that (if I remember correctly).

Then look at those compilation albums... 53, and that doesn't include the 15 box sets.

Can you say "CASH GRAB"? Regardless of your thoughts on the members of the band, their music, etc, they were definitely the most significant band of all time, but this sort of thing is beyond ridiculous, in my honest opinion.
 

Sharp Dressed Man

Down South Jukin'
Joined
Oct 9, 2013
Posts
15,233
Reaction score
10,408
Location
Denmark (Living in Greece)
From the label point of view, greatest hits albums are clearly a money machine, but to be fair, I think they can serve a purpose, regardless of the reasons behind them. For someone who is new to a band with a huge discography, they can give a quick overview of the bands career and let us not forget that some people simply want the singles. The trouble is, that some bands have tons of best of albums, making it a discography on its own and almost impossible for anyone to decide which one to get. Being an album guy myself, I was never interested in best offs, but I do own some, some for collectors reasons and some because they actually did something different with it, like a live best of, rerecorded best of or acoustic best of, or there was too much bonus stuff to ignore (I hate when they do that).
 

joker1961

Skaven Swear Runner
Joined
Mar 28, 2015
Posts
13,314
Reaction score
4,840
Location
Everywhere
From the label point of view, greatest hits albums are clearly a money machine, but to be fair, I think they can serve a purpose, regardless of the reasons behind them. For someone who is new to a band with a huge discography, they can give a quick overview of the bands career and let us not forget that some people simply want the singles. The trouble is, that some bands have tons of best of albums, making it a discography on its own and almost impossible for anyone to decide which one to get. Being an album guy myself, I was never interested in best offs, but I do own some, some for collectors reasons and some because they actually did something different with it, like a live best of, rerecorded best of or acoustic best of, or there was too much bonus stuff to ignore (I hate when they do that).


respect dude totally agree with you
 

Ar-Pharazon

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2013
Posts
1,392
Reaction score
454
After I sold a massive chunk of my CD collection years ago, I replaced some bigger bands stuff with GH albums, but more often than not, 2 disc sets with 25-30 tracks.
 

BikerDude

Dude
Joined
Jun 16, 2015
Posts
2,196
Reaction score
2,063
Location
East bum flunk. Upstate NY
Often they are referred to as "Rehab albums".
When the members go off the rails and crash and burn they do a Greatest Hits album.
And since few bands live that lifestyle any longer they are fewer I guess?
Actually it seems like albums are a dying thing. Of all kind.
We are back to the age of singles.
I saw a video where they randomly showed people the thing below on the street and none could identify it.

200px-45rpmadapter.jpg
 

Find member

Forum statistics

Threads
30,708
Posts
1,067,794
Members
6,367
Latest member
magicmoments

Staff online

Members online

Top