Well I think the
main goal of pop music these days is about being something one can dance to. While I don't really care for dancing music (since I don't really care for dancing) I do think some modern pop is quite good. P!nk is alright sometimes, I really like Jason Mraz (particularly his "Mr. A-Z" album), I LOVE a lot of the Scissor Sisters' stuff (though there is also some of their stuff that I don't. Very strong hits and strong misses), and some others. Overall I think older pop is better than modern pop but I'm not the kind of person to close it off just from it's time period.
Though there is quite a bit of music that makes me feel happier than pop music, like various amounts of unusual folk, musicals, and all around glam.
Yes you and I both. I for one don't necessarily like entire genres by any stretch of the imagination but I like at least a few bands or artists from just about every genre there is so it goes to show that it's not really that the genre has no appeal to me but that some bands just don't strike the right chord with me. That is how my favorite bands can include the likes of:
* A formerly 300+ pound former Texan with a strong
musical theater background.
* A
glam rock band who were about 30 years late to the party and was basically the culmination of AC/DC and Queen mixed into one group who's singer has the Excalibur of falsettos.
* A group of ten gypsies from different countries, mostly eastern Europe, who's ages range from mid 20's to late 60's and heavily rely on the accordion and fiddle as primary instruments in the self termed "
gypsy punk rock" genre.
* A pianist and a drummer from Boston who dress like
cabaret, carnival folks and introduce the piano to
punk rock in a very raw way.
* A golf loving, born again Christian who sings songs about necrophilia, nightmares, dead babies, and all around psychotic themes whilst getting executed nightly to earn the title of "The Original
Shock Rock Legend".
And so on...