Illegal Music Downloading

Tattoo'd Lady

Scentless Apprentice
Joined
Jan 5, 2010
Posts
681
Reaction score
1
Location
Oregon
Illegal downloading has impacted the music industry in a huge way. Some music lovers believe its a great trend while others absolutely despise it. What are your thoughts and practices on illegal downloading?
 

flipflop

Prisoner of rock'n'roll
Joined
Jan 20, 2010
Posts
1,409
Reaction score
1
Location
Denmark
Illegal downloading is stealing and it's hurting the artists.
 

Magic

Woman of the World
Staff member
Administrator
Joined
Apr 20, 2009
Posts
24,975
Reaction score
4,760
Location
Ohio, USA
I have some thoughts on this issue, and my position on the issue has changed drastically over the past year or so. I will post my thoughts after a few more people post in this thread.


I am neutral, btw. Not for it or against it.
 

Oblivion

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2009
Posts
732
Reaction score
4
Location
Belgium
:) I buy albums when the artist needs a little support but most of my music is downloaded (peer to peer) and not bought. As a student I can't afford to be against downloading...
 

Dave78

Dave's not here, man
Joined
Nov 13, 2009
Posts
2,143
Reaction score
427
Illegal downloading is stealing and it's hurting the artists.
Of course the illegal downloading of MP3's takes money out of the artists pockets, but I'd guess that (based on the language of a typical recording contract) illegal downloading takes MORE money out of the pockets of record executives. I think that's why record companies fight this issue so vehemently, and that's why part of me has no sympathy for the situation. Rightfully so or not, they seemingly spend a dollar trying to recover every nickel lost to illegal downloading. But what about the artist? In the olden days groups would get a percentage of album sales, but what about today's secondary market? Who is going after all these sellers on Ebay or Amazon for any royalties due an artist for selling their used cds? And who is policing the local libraries making sure you don't take one of their cds home and burn a copy for yourself? And how do you keep track of people using the "friends and family" network of music sharing?

Ten years ago when Napster was all the rage I would occasionally download a song here and there, but with long download times, often incorrect song information and lack of variety it was often more trouble than it was worth for me. Today I use iTunes and I am happy to get clean versions of songs which are plainly identified and download in seconds, not tens of minutes. And the fact that something goes towards the artist from Apple's iTunes gives me a warm feeling that in some small way I am helping bands and artists from the 70's like Chuck Negron and Three Dog Night with a revenue stream.
 

METALPRIEST

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2009
Posts
33,603
Reaction score
67
Location
U.S.A.
Something I don't have to worry about. I'm an avid collector, I prefer hard copies, own almost 5,000 discs (not including movies) and have a very nice display setting for all of them in my home.

It's gonna be a great collection of music to pass down and will to my kids (who will be in posession of it and love alot of it already) by the time my time is up here. :cheers:
 

0000

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2008
Posts
5,316
Reaction score
10
Location
I
I have a lot of illegally downloaded music, and I will continue to download... I prefer hard copies, but I'm not paying 9.99 for and 8 song cd, and if I buy them used on Amazon it's no benefit to the companies or artists...so I might as well save myself the money that isn't going to help anyone besides the seller

With the internet and ease there is no way to avoid downloading and illegal sharing, I think the record companies need to come up with a new way to sell and market because there is no way around the downloading
 

Mr. Shadow

"Classic" Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2009
Posts
2,576
Reaction score
8
I think the industry's biggest concern is the newer music, which I don't care for. As a fan of Classic Rock and Blues I have spent tens of thousands on it. But the majority of that has been used purchases. I download lots of stuff. Most of the concerts are not copyrighted materials. I have no problem getting digital copies of music previously or currently owned in another format. Most of what I am snagging is not available for purchace otherwise. The more I'm exposed to the more likely I am to buy something from that artist later. Some days I may grab one or two albums. Other days it might be close th forty.

How do I put money into Jimi Hendix's hand, Or Janis or Jim Morrison, or the other deceased Rock greats? I'm not interesting in padding an agents pocket or that of some fat cat that doesn't even listen to the music they control. Until the economy crashed I was spending over $100 a month on music. I still maintain a 50 song per month account with emusic. They almost doubled in cost last year, but did so in order to add the Sony catalog.

Make music affordable and people will buy it. Prohibition has never worked.
 

Magic

Woman of the World
Staff member
Administrator
Joined
Apr 20, 2009
Posts
24,975
Reaction score
4,760
Location
Ohio, USA
Here is my philosophy.......I have supported the music industry for over 35 years now. I have supported numerous musicians over the years by attending concerts, some musicians I have seen numerous times. I purchased over 350 vinyl albums, 2 boxes of 45's, about 100 or so 8 track tapes, approx. 200 cassetts, and I still continue to buy CD's.

I feel absolutely no guilt what-so-ever downloading and replacing my old vinyl collection or any other music I have already purchased.

I will download a new artist's music, which usually isn't in the best music format to begin with, to sample the music. If I like the music, I will buy the CD, which is recorded in the best format.
 

Find member

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
30,713
Posts
1,067,873
Members
6,366
Latest member
magicmoments

Members online

Top