Ryan81
New Member
Hello. I'm sorry if this has been discussed here already. I just found this place a couple of weeks ago so I'm just kind of finding my way around. Anyhow, as the title says, have all the best songs been written already? I know that "best" is very subjective, but there are only 12 tones in our music (without taking octaves into consideration) and only a handful of those sound pleasing to the ear when they are combined or layed out one after another (ie chord progressions). Obviously the rhythm they are played in and the instruments that are used add a tremendous amount of variety, but think about the massive number of songs that have been written.
Take Rock N Roll for example. By rock n roll I mean music consisting of drums, bass, guitar, and usually with vocals and sometimes a keyboard instrument of some type. There have been hundreds of thousands, if not more, rock n roll songs written. So when you take into consideration the finite number of notes, progressions, and appropriate rhythms that work for rock n roll one has to imagine the well is getting pretty dry.
While some might argue, I think most around here would agree that the music of the past 20 years or so pales in comparison to the music that was coming out in the 60's through the 80's. I think one of the main reasons for that is because it's all been done already. It's easier than ever to make a decent sounding track in your bedroom these days so that means you have more people than ever putting their music out there, but yet...nothing is really lighting the world on fire.
So is the well really dry or perhaps maybe people were saying the same thing in 1962 right before four guys from Liverpool figured they would give it a try and in the process open up a whole new world of songs for us all to enjoy for the next several decades? Sadly, I think it is the former.
(Sorry for the long winded post. It's a bad habit of mine on forums like this. I am completely unable to edit my thoughts into a few concise sentences that people tend to appreciate more, but I will work on it.)
Take Rock N Roll for example. By rock n roll I mean music consisting of drums, bass, guitar, and usually with vocals and sometimes a keyboard instrument of some type. There have been hundreds of thousands, if not more, rock n roll songs written. So when you take into consideration the finite number of notes, progressions, and appropriate rhythms that work for rock n roll one has to imagine the well is getting pretty dry.
While some might argue, I think most around here would agree that the music of the past 20 years or so pales in comparison to the music that was coming out in the 60's through the 80's. I think one of the main reasons for that is because it's all been done already. It's easier than ever to make a decent sounding track in your bedroom these days so that means you have more people than ever putting their music out there, but yet...nothing is really lighting the world on fire.
So is the well really dry or perhaps maybe people were saying the same thing in 1962 right before four guys from Liverpool figured they would give it a try and in the process open up a whole new world of songs for us all to enjoy for the next several decades? Sadly, I think it is the former.
(Sorry for the long winded post. It's a bad habit of mine on forums like this. I am completely unable to edit my thoughts into a few concise sentences that people tend to appreciate more, but I will work on it.)
