Neil Young unveils his music player

That 70s Guy

Super Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
Joined
Jan 21, 2010
Posts
16,515
Reaction score
6,504
Location
Nova Scotia Canada
classicrockmagazine.com

pono.jpg


Neil Young unveiled his Pono music player last night – and its associated Kickstarter campaign drew over $1m in pledges in the following hours.

He took to the stage at South By Southwest in Austin, Texas, to show off the triangular device and tell the audience: “Once you hear this you can’t go back.”

Pono has been under development for nearly three years after Young decided he couldn’t live with the sound output of MP3 players. He said: “Everything started to die because of the MP3 and the cheapening of quality to where it was unrecognisable.

“The album had no value. Only individual tracks had value. As a guy who’d been making records for many years, I was pissed off. I love every note on every song on every record.

“People were still buying it because they like music – but they were buying xeroxes of the Mona Lisa.”

Young says Pono will deliver music the way the artist intended, and the project has the support of the major record labels. The launch edition of the player contains 128MB of memory, which is enough to carry up to 2000 high-resolution songs saved in a new format.

A promotional video on the Kickstarter page shows David Crosby reacting to having listened to the new device, saying: “That’s the best sound I ever heard in a car – in fact it might be the best sound I ever heard.” Other big names including Dave Grohl and Jack White offer their own support.

But not everyone agrees Pono is a good idea – tech site Gizmodo says there appears to be “no science” behind the project, arguing that producing higher-resolution audio files doesn’t equate to a better sound. They add: “When the folks at Pono provide us with scientific evidence which proves that 192kHz/24-bit audio is better than the CD-quality standard, we’ll let you know.”

The Kickstarter campaign runs for a further 24 days, with its original $800,000 target set to be exceeded several times over.
 

LG

Fade To Black
Joined
Apr 20, 2009
Posts
36,862
Reaction score
73
Good for Neil, he's not the only one who's concerned about where the future of music is heading.

As far as "Gizmodo" and their demand for proof, I have a 24-192 vinyl rip of Harvest that absolutely KILLS the CD version, I don't need scientific instruments to tell me that much, it would be obvious to anyone who sits down and really listens.
 

Lynch

Here for the cookies and the tunes
Joined
Jan 5, 2010
Posts
32,251
Reaction score
11,187
Location
The Land of Sky Blue Waters
I don't understand why they've made these things so friggin ugly and childish looking. It looks like a toy for a pre-schooler. Could have the greatest sound in history but the physical characteristics are horrible.
 

2LITTLETIME

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2012
Posts
659
Reaction score
1
i follow head fi audio blog re recent developments-ill watch this one
 

Sweaty

ThE OtHeR rAmOnE
Joined
Jan 30, 2010
Posts
5,722
Reaction score
26
Location
Chesterfield, England
Sounds interesting, I will look into this one, looks a bit strange but if the quality is good then it has to have some mileage..
 

Khor1255

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2011
Posts
2,967
Reaction score
68
“When the folks at Pono provide us with scientific evidence which proves that 192kHz/24-bit audio is better than the CD-quality standard, we’ll let you know.”
This part is particularly funny. I mean, where do they think they are going to get this 'scientific evidence'? 1000 monkeys with 1000 headsets?

this is where he data factoid crowd always delivers comedy gold. They expect everything from the listening experience to the beauty of a sunset be somehow quantified and dismiss anything that isn't. It is this kind of thinking that allows a red dot on a white canvas to pass as art.
 

Soot and Stars

I AM SOOT!
Joined
Sep 23, 2009
Posts
16,434
Reaction score
123
Location
Small Town NH, USA
I don't understand why they've made these things so friggin ugly and childish looking. It looks like a toy for a pre-schooler. Could have the greatest sound in history but the physical characteristics are horrible.

I think I see where they are going with it. The triangular thing looks like it's made to set down flat so you can still see the screen/text/etc. It's not the worst design I've seen. I kind of like it! :heheh:

That being said I've lost all interest in digital regardless. I'll be riding the c.d. format until it's last dying breath. :)
 

mrJim

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2013
Posts
841
Reaction score
5
Location
South Carolina
Good for Neil Young. I careless what gizwhomever or anyone else says. if taken from a high band source there is a difference.

I haven't seen the specs on this things yet, but I will be watching it.


UPDATED:

Looks pretty interesting, It a sales model and a Player model. The sales model looks like it to sell "Albums" in the highest quality digital format.

http://www.ponomusic.com/#home

I really like the what they are saying. But I am a bit guarded cause the player is priced at $399 with and early special sale price at $300. I am curious how they managed to create a high quality player at that price point.


Jim
 
Last edited:

AboutAGirl

oh, be nice
Joined
Apr 21, 2005
Posts
2,693
Reaction score
11
I'm excited to hear how this thing sounds.

If they make a low cost edition with less space, say $50 or less, I'd probably get one. I'd use that one just for a handful of my favorite records, and any Pono-exclusive music that Neil Young or Tom Petty might release.

There's no way that I would be switching strictly to Pono, I'd have to be a mighty rich man to give up on my digital collection so soon.
 

coltrane2

Musicologist
Joined
Dec 25, 2011
Posts
350
Reaction score
0
Location
UK
It's really not difficult to attain great sound: the main reason Mp3 sounds shit is that people don't pay enough attention to source quality or follow that through to the output system. That was also true of vinyl and CD and it's true now. Simple solution:

1. Don't download Mp3s of less than a minimum 192kpbs. If you can, go for 320kpbs or lossless.

2. Get a good DAC. A huge part of Mp3's lack of fidelity is down to people playing the medium through a laptop or PC at home, which almost invariably houses a poor quality audio DAC. This is because hi-fidelity digital to analogue conversion are not currently high on the agenda of computer manufacturers. You can get an excellent DAC for not much money at all (Arcam, Audioquest and Cambridge Audio make great ones for example).

3. Good amp and speaker match as last leg - why would computer speakers or a sound bar provide high fidelity? And forget about Sonos - it's not made for people looking to find a system to bring their music truly to life.

Follow the above and be prepared to be amazed as all of this guff about poor sound quality in the digital age fades into the background.

I played Marianne Faithfull's Broken English on 180g vinyl 'tother day (through my Rega 2 turntable) and did a direct A-B comparison throughout the LP vs. a 320kbps file via my Audioquest Dragonfly DAC and honestly it was impossible to discern any difference (and I have a good ear for difference).

Don't blame Mp3....work with it and improve your system!
 

Find member

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
30,715
Posts
1,068,621
Members
6,368
Latest member
allmylife11

Members online

Top