When Keith Richard Was Actually Good

AboutAGirl

oh, be nice
Joined
Apr 21, 2005
Posts
2,693
Reaction score
11
For me Keith is still absolutely great. I think A Bigger Bang is up there with ANY Stones album.

I always have been more interested in songwriting and singing though. And his singing on This Place Is Empty kicks ass.
 

Foxhound

retired
Joined
Sep 22, 2009
Posts
3,584
Reaction score
8
Location
Toronto, Canada
I always thought Mick Taylor was the guitar player who made the Stones great at that point in their career.

I completely disagree. Mick Taylor did not make the Stones great. They were already great prior to his joining in 1969. In fact, they recorded most of their biggest hits prior to him coming on board.

Moreover, the Stones were in an artistic decline during the latter part of his tenure. Both "Goat's Head Soup" and "It's Only Rock 'n Roll" were sub par albums for the Stones compared to their previous output. I can't say that Mick Taylor was among the factors that dragged them down, but the Stones did revitalize themselves after Ron Wood joined. "Some Girls", their second with Ronnie, was their best since "Sticky Fingers". Plus the Stones have stayed great without Mick Taylor.

:drums:

Spike said:
IMHO, Beggars through Exile are all top quality -- one of the best four album runs in rock history. But I thought they went downhill fast with Goat's Head Soup.

I agree that the Stones went downhill fast with "Goat's Head Soup" - but I'd add "Between the Buttons", "Flowers" and "Their Satanic Majesties Request" to the start of their great album run.

Drummer Chris said:
There's no doubt that Mick Taylor is a technically a better guitar player than Keith, Brian Or Ronnie lead and rythym-wise but it is Keith's rough-style rythym riffs that made the Stones huge.

You've said it all in a nutshell.

:grinthumb
 

FretBuzz

Monkey Man
Joined
Jun 25, 2010
Posts
343
Reaction score
3
Location
HOT- lanta
I agree with just about everything you and Drummer Chris have said, FoxHound.

IMO the Stones peaked with Exile. By all the recent accounts about the making of Exile, it was a far more difficult period for the band than I ever realized. While I like Goat's Head and IORR quite a bit, they are definitely not as good as Exile - perhaps the Stones were still feeling burnt out when they started working on Goat's Head (the prolonged use of heroin and cocaine was no doubt taking its toll also).

I think a big part of the Stones rougher, heavier sound in the late 60s/early 70s was their producer Jimmy Miller. The first thing he produced was Jumping Jack Flash and his last album with the Stones was Goat's Head Soup. Supposedly he was a burnt out junkie by then. That could have something to do with the decline in quality of that overall album.

IORR was the first album that the Glimmer Twins produced themselves, and it was the last one with Mick Taylor. He quit in the middle of it, he only plays on 7 of the 10 tracks. That is one reason that this album isn't stronger.

I agree that the Stones had a great comeback with Some Girls - while not as technically proficient as Taylor, Woody was a good replacement.

Even though the Stones albums from the past 25 years or so haven't been as good as their earlier stuff, there are gems on every one, and I think all of them are worthwhile efforts. Some of them are great.

I hate to say it, but I think Woody has been carrying Keef when they play live for several years now. If you play close attention to the dvds Shine a Light or The Biggest Bang, Woody is often playing Keef's old rhythm parts while Keef noodles over it. Not on every song, but on a lot of them.

Word has it that Keith has arthritis pretty bad now and that's been hampering his playing (and some of his songs are a real workout for your left hand, particularly Brown Sugar..after 3-4 minutes of playing it, my hand always aches!)


I still think Keef is the riff-meister though, he is rock 'n' roll.
 
Last edited:

Hepcat

retired
Joined
Sep 18, 2009
Posts
3,409
Reaction score
9
Location
Toronto, Ontario
Where's Martha?

For that matter where are JackInBox, Big Generator, Reverend Rock, Music Wench, Drummer Chris and Spike?

:huh:
 

Foxhound

retired
Joined
Sep 22, 2009
Posts
3,584
Reaction score
8
Location
Toronto, Canada
FretBuzz said:
I hate to say it, but I think Woody has been carrying Keef when they play live for several years now. If you play close attention to the dvds Shine a Light or The Biggest Bang, Woody is often playing Keef's old rhythm parts while Keef noodles over it. Not on every song, but on a lot of them.

Word has it that Keith has arthritis pretty bad now and that's been hampering his playing (and some of his songs are a real workout for your left hand, particularly Brown Sugar..after 3-4 minutes of playing it, my hand always aches!)

Sad. None of that makes me hopeful for a fiftieth anniversary tour.

:(

They could stilll record an album or three though!

:rock:
 

Flower

retired
Joined
Apr 27, 2007
Posts
7,666
Reaction score
28
Location
In a maze, under a rainbow
Keith always gives a good interview .. love to listen to him talk. I can't understand Charlie Watts when he talks, nor do I find him as interesting ...

I wonder when the arthritis started? That can be a factor ... :dunno:

:grinthumb
 

wolfsblood

Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2009
Posts
90
Reaction score
0
I think Keith is a good guitarist but he started getting lazy after he hit his peak around 1970 or so. The Rolling Stones had a lot of session musicians in the mid-70s, esp. on the Black And Blue album. And Ron Wood has evolved into the lead player over the last twenty years or so. So Keith hasn't had to keep his solo skills honed much. Check out his horrid solo on Sympathy For The Devil from the 2003 40 Licks video.
 

FretBuzz

Monkey Man
Joined
Jun 25, 2010
Posts
343
Reaction score
3
Location
HOT- lanta
Sad. None of that makes me hopeful for a fiftieth anniversary tour.

:(

They could stilll record an album or three though!

:rock:


I would be shocked if they don't do a 50th anniversary tour. Heck, Mick said recently that a 2011 tour is a strong possibility.

Keith always gives a good interview .. love to listen to him talk. I can't understand Charlie Watts when he talks, nor do I find him as interesting ...

I wonder when the arthritis started? That can be a factor ... :dunno:

:grinthumb

I agree 100% about Keith's interviews...they're always entertaining and though-provoking (for me, anyhow).

I don't know much about arthritis. I'm starting to get it and I'm only 49...:(




I think Keith is a good guitarist but he started getting lazy after he hit his peak around 1970 or so. The Rolling Stones had a lot of session musicians in the mid-70s, esp. on the Black And Blue album. And Ron Wood has evolved into the lead player over the last twenty years or so. So Keith hasn't had to keep his solo skills honed much. Check out his horrid solo on Sympathy For The Devil from the 2003 40 Licks video.

As far as I know, the only album that they used studio guitarists on was Black and Blue. They were trying out guitarists to replace Taylor during those sessions. I agree that Keith's solos sometimes aren't so hot - but IMO he's the best rhythm guitarist there is.
 

Find member

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
30,715
Posts
1,068,621
Members
6,368
Latest member
allmylife11

Members online

No members online now.
Top